ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A vs MSI MAG 32CQ6F
ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · Fast IPSMSI MAG 32CQ6F
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76.
- Resolution: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A leads (0.3 ms vs 0.5 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
MSI MAG 32CQ6F
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A | MSI MAG 32CQ6F | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 76 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | VA |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A or MSI MAG 32CQ6F better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76. Resolution: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A leads (0.3 ms vs 0.5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG279QM5A leads (240 Hz vs 180 Hz).