ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A vs Gigabyte M27Q-X
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A
27″ · 2560×1440 · 210 Hz · Fast IPSGigabyte M27Q-X
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A and Gigabyte M27Q-X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 83.
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q-X leads (240 Hz vs 210 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A
If you care most about response time.
Gigabyte M27Q-X
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A | Gigabyte M27Q-X | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 83 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 210 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $280 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A or Gigabyte M27Q-X better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A and Gigabyte M27Q-X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 83. Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q-X leads (240 Hz vs 210 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27Q-X leads (240 Hz vs 210 Hz).