ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A vs KOORUI 27E3QK
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A
27″ · 2560×1440 · 210 Hz · Fast IPSKOORUI 27E3QK
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A and KOORUI 27E3QK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 83.
- Refresh rate: KOORUI 27E3QK leads (240 Hz vs 210 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A
If you care most about response time.
KOORUI 27E3QK
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A | KOORUI 27E3QK | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Gear score | 83 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 210 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A or KOORUI 27E3QK better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A and KOORUI 27E3QK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 82 and 83. Refresh rate: KOORUI 27E3QK leads (240 Hz vs 210 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQ5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: KOORUI 27E3QK leads (240 Hz vs 210 Hz).