ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A vs Gigabyte MO32U
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A
27″ · 2560×1440 · 300 Hz · Fast IPSGigabyte MO32U
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · OLEDASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A and Gigabyte MO32U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 86.
- Resolution: Gigabyte MO32U leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A leads (300 Hz vs 165 Hz).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A
If you care most about refresh rate.
Gigabyte MO32U
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A | Gigabyte MO32U | |
|---|---|---|
| 86 | Gear score | 86 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 300 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A or Gigabyte MO32U better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A and Gigabyte MO32U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 86. Resolution: Gigabyte MO32U leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A leads (300 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A leads (300 Hz vs 165 Hz).