ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A vs Samsung Odyssey Neo G8
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A
27″ · 2560×1440 · 300 Hz · Fast IPSSamsung Odyssey Neo G8
32″ · 3840×2160 · 240 Hz · VAASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A and Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 86.
- Resolution: Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A leads (300 Hz vs 240 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung Odyssey Neo G8
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A | Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 | |
|---|---|---|
| 86 | Gear score | 86 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 300 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Fast IPS | Panel | VA |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A or Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A and Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 86. Resolution: Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A leads (300 Hz vs 240 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A leads (0.3 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQM5A leads (300 Hz vs 240 Hz).