ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A vs Pixio PXC32
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A
27″ · 3840×2160 · 80 Hz · IPSPixio PXC32
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · PVAASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A and Pixio PXC32 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 68.
- Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Pixio PXC32 leads (144 Hz vs 80 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (0.3 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Pixio PXC32
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A | Pixio PXC32 | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 68 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 80 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | PVA |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A or Pixio PXC32 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A and Pixio PXC32 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 68. Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Pixio PXC32 leads (144 Hz vs 80 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (0.3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Pixio PXC32 leads (144 Hz vs 80 Hz).