ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A vs Samsung C32JG56
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A
27″ · 3840×2160 · 80 Hz · IPSSamsung C32JG56
32″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · VAASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A and Samsung C32JG56 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 68.
- Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Samsung C32JG56 leads (144 Hz vs 80 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (0.3 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Samsung C32JG56
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A | Samsung C32JG56 | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 68 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 80 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A or Samsung C32JG56 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A and Samsung C32JG56 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 68. Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Samsung C32JG56 leads (144 Hz vs 80 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (0.3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung C32JG56 leads (144 Hz vs 80 Hz).