ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A vs Samsung C49RG9
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A
27″ · 3840×2160 · 80 Hz · IPSSamsung C49RG9
49″ · 5120×1440 · 120 Hz · VAASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A and Samsung C49RG9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 68.
- Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440).
- Refresh rate: Samsung C49RG9 leads (120 Hz vs 80 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (0.3 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Samsung C49RG9
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A | Samsung C49RG9 | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 68 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 80 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 0.3 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,300 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A or Samsung C49RG9 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A and Samsung C49RG9 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 68. Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440). Refresh rate: Samsung C49RG9 leads (120 Hz vs 80 Hz). Response time: ASUS TUF Gaming VG27UQEL5A leads (0.3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung C49RG9 leads (120 Hz vs 80 Hz).