ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B vs MSI MAG 255F E20
ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAMSI MAG 255F E20
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Rapid IPSASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255F E20
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B | MSI MAG 255F E20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| VA | Panel | Rapid IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $289 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B or MSI MAG 255F E20 better?
ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG32WQ3B leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 180 Hz).