Monitors / Comparison

ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3A vs MSI MAG 32CQ6F

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3A

34″ · 3440×1440 · 180 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 77.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution88
Panel66
Response time90
VS
Monitor · MSI

MSI MAG 32CQ6F

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 76.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate72
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time97
Verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3A and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76.

  • Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3A leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
  • Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Pick this

ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3A

If you care most about resolution.

Pick this

MSI MAG 32CQ6F

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3AMSI MAG 32CQ6F
77Gear score76
34″Screen size31.5″
3440×1440Resolution2560×1440
180 HzRefresh rate180 Hz
VAPanelVA
1 msResponse time0.5 ms
≈ $349Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3A or MSI MAG 32CQ6F better?

ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3A and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76. Resolution: ASUS TUF Gaming VG34VQL3A leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).