Monitors / Comparison
ASUS VT168H vs LG N1941WP-PF
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS VT168H
15.6″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time30
VS
Monitor · LG
LG N1941WP-PF
19″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time50
Verdict
On specs, LG N1941WP-PF comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for ASUS VT168H.
- Response time: LG N1941WP-PF leads (5 ms vs 10 ms).
Pick this
LG N1941WP-PF
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS VT168H | LG N1941WP-PF | |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Gear score | 24 |
| 15.6″ | Screen size | 19″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 10 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS VT168H or LG N1941WP-PF better?
On specs, LG N1941WP-PF comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for ASUS VT168H. Response time: LG N1941WP-PF leads (5 ms vs 10 ms).