ASUS VW22AT-CSM vs Planar LA2250RTPW
ASUS VW22AT-CSM
22″ · 1680×1050 · 60 Hz · TNPlanar LA2250RTPW
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 75 HzASUS VW22AT-CSM and Planar LA2250RTPW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 36.
- Resolution: Planar LA2250RTPW leads (1920×1080 vs 1680×1050).
- Refresh rate: Planar LA2250RTPW leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).
ASUS VW22AT-CSM
If you care most about response time.
Planar LA2250RTPW
If you care most about resolution, refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS VW22AT-CSM | Planar LA2250RTPW | |
|---|---|---|
| 35 | Gear score | 36 |
| 22″ | Screen size | 21.5″ |
| 1680×1050 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 14 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS VW22AT-CSM or Planar LA2250RTPW better?
ASUS VW22AT-CSM and Planar LA2250RTPW are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 35 and 36. Resolution: Planar LA2250RTPW leads (1920×1080 vs 1680×1050). Refresh rate: Planar LA2250RTPW leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS VW22AT-CSM leads (5 ms vs 14 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Planar LA2250RTPW leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).