AXM 2798 vs BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K
AXM 2798
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNBenQ ZOWIE XL2540K
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNAXM 2798 and BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: AXM 2798 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
AXM 2798
If you care most about resolution.
BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AXM 2798 | BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| TN | Panel | TN |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AXM 2798 or BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K better?
AXM 2798 and BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: AXM 2798 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ ZOWIE XL2540K leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).