Monitors / Comparison
BenQ BL3200PT vs HP Z27n
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ BL3200PT
32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · HP
HP Z27n
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict
BenQ BL3200PT and HP Z27n are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.
- Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 14 ms).
Pick this
BenQ BL3200PT
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ BL3200PT | HP Z27n | |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Gear score | 49 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 14 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ BL3200PT or HP Z27n better?
BenQ BL3200PT and HP Z27n are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 14 ms).
Similar comparisons
BenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ BL2381TBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ EW2770QZBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ PD3200QBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS Designo MX279HSBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVHP Z27n vs ASUS Designo MX279HSHP Z27n vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVHP Z27n vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248QVHP Z27n vs BenQ BL2381T