Monitors / Comparison

BenQ BL3200PT vs LG W3000H-Bn

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ BL3200PT

32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · LG

LG W3000H-Bn

30″ · 2560×1600 · 60 Hz · IPS · 2007
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution83
Panel80
Response time50
Recency20
Verdict

BenQ BL3200PT and LG W3000H-Bn are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.

  • Resolution: LG W3000H-Bn leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440).
  • Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this

BenQ BL3200PT

If you care most about response time.

Pick this

LG W3000H-Bn

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ BL3200PTLG W3000H-Bn
49Gear score49
32″Screen size30″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1600
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelIPS
4 msResponse time5 ms
—Release year2007

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is BenQ BL3200PT or LG W3000H-Bn better?

BenQ BL3200PT and LG W3000H-Bn are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: LG W3000H-Bn leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440). Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).

Similar comparisons

BenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ BL2381TBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ EW2770QZBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ PD3200QBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS Designo MX279HSBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVLG W3000H-Bn vs ASUS Designo MX279HSLG W3000H-Bn vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVLG W3000H-Bn vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248QVLG W3000H-Bn vs BenQ BL2381T