BenQ BL3200PT vs Philips 230B8QJEB/69
BenQ BL3200PT
32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VAPhilips 230B8QJEB/69
22.5″ · 1920×1200 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ BL3200PT and Philips 230B8QJEB/69 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.
- Resolution: BenQ BL3200PT leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200).
- Refresh rate: Philips 230B8QJEB/69 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
BenQ BL3200PT
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Philips 230B8QJEB/69
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ BL3200PT | Philips 230B8QJEB/69 | |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Gear score | 49 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 22.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1200 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ BL3200PT or Philips 230B8QJEB/69 better?
BenQ BL3200PT and Philips 230B8QJEB/69 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: BenQ BL3200PT leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200). Refresh rate: Philips 230B8QJEB/69 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 230B8QJEB/69 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).