BenQ BL3200PT vs Philips 243V7QJABF/00
BenQ BL3200PT
32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VAPhilips 243V7QJABF/00
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ BL3200PT and Philips 243V7QJABF/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.
- Resolution: BenQ BL3200PT leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 243V7QJABF/00 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
BenQ BL3200PT
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 243V7QJABF/00
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ BL3200PT | Philips 243V7QJABF/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Gear score | 49 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $148 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ BL3200PT or Philips 243V7QJABF/00 better?
BenQ BL3200PT and Philips 243V7QJABF/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: BenQ BL3200PT leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 243V7QJABF/00 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 243V7QJABF/00 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).