Monitors / Comparison

BenQ BL3200PT vs Philips 246E9QDSB

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ BL3200PT

32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Philips

Philips 246E9QDSB

23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate25
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time60
Verdict

BenQ BL3200PT and Philips 246E9QDSB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.

  • Resolution: BenQ BL3200PT leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
  • Refresh rate: Philips 246E9QDSB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Pick this

BenQ BL3200PT

If you care most about resolution.

Pick this

Philips 246E9QDSB

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ BL3200PTPhilips 246E9QDSB
49Gear score49
32″Screen size23.8″
2560×1440Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate75 Hz
VAPanelIPS
4 msResponse time4 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is BenQ BL3200PT or Philips 246E9QDSB better?

BenQ BL3200PT and Philips 246E9QDSB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: BenQ BL3200PT leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 246E9QDSB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: Philips 246E9QDSB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).