Monitors / Comparison

BenQ BL3200PT vs Planar PXL3280W

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ BL3200PT

32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Planar

Planar PXL3280W

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
Verdict

BenQ BL3200PT and Planar PXL3280W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.

  • Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this

BenQ BL3200PT

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ BL3200PTPlanar PXL3280W
49Gear score49
32″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelIPS
4 msResponse time8 ms
—Estimated price≈ $240

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is BenQ BL3200PT or Planar PXL3280W better?

BenQ BL3200PT and Planar PXL3280W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Response time: BenQ BL3200PT leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).

Similar comparisons

BenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ BL2381TBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ EW2770QZBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ PD3200QBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS Designo MX279HSBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVPlanar PXL3280W vs ASUS Designo MX279HSPlanar PXL3280W vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVPlanar PXL3280W vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248QVPlanar PXL3280W vs BenQ BL2381T