Monitors / Comparison

BenQ BL3200PT vs Samsung CH711

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ BL3200PT

32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung CH711

32″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict

BenQ BL3200PT and Samsung CH711 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ BL3200PTSamsung CH711
49Gear score49
32″Screen size32″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelVA
4 msResponse time4 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is BenQ BL3200PT or Samsung CH711 better?

BenQ BL3200PT and Samsung CH711 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.

Similar comparisons

BenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ BL2381TBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ EW2770QZBenQ BL3200PT vs BenQ PD3200QBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS Designo MX279HSBenQ BL3200PT vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVSamsung CH711 vs ASUS Designo MX279HSSamsung CH711 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248CRVSamsung CH711 vs ASUS ProArt Display PA248QVSamsung CH711 vs BenQ BL2381T