Monitors / Comparison

BenQ EW2770QZ vs Philips 243B1

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ EW2770QZ

27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Philips

Philips 243B1

23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 49.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate25
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time60
Verdict

BenQ EW2770QZ and Philips 243B1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49.

  • Resolution: BenQ EW2770QZ leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
  • Refresh rate: Philips 243B1 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
  • Response time: Philips 243B1 leads (4 ms vs 14 ms).
Pick this

BenQ EW2770QZ

If you care most about resolution.

Pick this

Philips 243B1

If you care most about refresh rate, response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ EW2770QZPhilips 243B1
49Gear score49
27″Screen size23.8″
2560×1440Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate75 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
14 msResponse time4 ms
—Estimated price≈ $221

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is BenQ EW2770QZ or Philips 243B1 better?

BenQ EW2770QZ and Philips 243B1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 49 and 49. Resolution: BenQ EW2770QZ leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 243B1 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 243B1 leads (4 ms vs 14 ms).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: Philips 243B1 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).