Monitors / Comparison

BenQ EW2780Q vs Samsung UE510

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ EW2780Q

27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 51.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung UE510

28″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · TN · 2014
GEAR SCORE 51.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel50
Response time90
Recency20
Verdict

BenQ EW2780Q and Samsung UE510 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51.

  • Resolution: Samsung UE510 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
  • Response time: Samsung UE510 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this

Samsung UE510

If you care most about resolution, response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ EW2780QSamsung UE510
51Gear score51
27″Screen size28″
2560×1440Resolution3840×2160
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelTN
5 msResponse time1 ms
—Release year2014
≈ $398Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is BenQ EW2780Q or Samsung UE510 better?

BenQ EW2780Q and Samsung UE510 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51. Resolution: Samsung UE510 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Response time: Samsung UE510 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).