Monitors / Comparison

BenQ EW2780Q vs Yamakasi 300 Sparta LED

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ EW2780Q

27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 51.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Yamakasi

Yamakasi 300 Sparta LED

30″ · 2560×1600 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 51.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution83
Panel80
Response time43
Verdict

BenQ EW2780Q and Yamakasi 300 Sparta LED are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51.

  • Resolution: Yamakasi 300 Sparta LED leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440).
  • Response time: BenQ EW2780Q leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Pick this

BenQ EW2780Q

If you care most about response time.

Pick this

Yamakasi 300 Sparta LED

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ EW2780QYamakasi 300 Sparta LED
51Gear score51
27″Screen size30″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1600
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
5 msResponse time6 ms
≈ $398Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is BenQ EW2780Q or Yamakasi 300 Sparta LED better?

BenQ EW2780Q and Yamakasi 300 Sparta LED are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51. Resolution: Yamakasi 300 Sparta LED leads (2560×1600 vs 2560×1440). Response time: BenQ EW2780Q leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).