Monitors / Comparison
BenQ EW2780Q vs Yamakasi Q270
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ EW2780Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Yamakasi
Yamakasi Q270
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time43
Verdict
BenQ EW2780Q and Yamakasi Q270 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51.
- Response time: BenQ EW2780Q leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Pick this
BenQ EW2780Q
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ EW2780Q | Yamakasi Q270 | |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | Gear score | 51 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 6 ms |
| ≈ $398 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ EW2780Q or Yamakasi Q270 better?
BenQ EW2780Q and Yamakasi Q270 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51. Response time: BenQ EW2780Q leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).