BenQ EX270M vs Gigabyte AORUS FV43U
Gigabyte AORUS FV43U
43″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · VABenQ EX270M and Gigabyte AORUS FV43U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FV43U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ EX270M leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
BenQ EX270M
If you care most about refresh rate.
Gigabyte AORUS FV43U
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ EX270M | Gigabyte AORUS FV43U | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 43″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| ≈ $280 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ EX270M or Gigabyte AORUS FV43U better?
BenQ EX270M and Gigabyte AORUS FV43U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FV43U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ EX270M leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ EX270M leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).