Monitors / Comparison
BenQ GW2255 vs Samsung S24C200BL
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ GW2255
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Response time43
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S24C200BL
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Response time50
Verdict
BenQ GW2255 and Samsung S24C200BL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 33 and 34.
- Response time: Samsung S24C200BL leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Pick this
Samsung S24C200BL
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ GW2255 | Samsung S24C200BL | |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | Gear score | 34 |
| 21.5″ | Screen size | 23.6″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 6 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ GW2255 or Samsung S24C200BL better?
BenQ GW2255 and Samsung S24C200BL are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 33 and 34. Response time: Samsung S24C200BL leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).