BenQ GW2490 vs Philips BDM3490UC/27
BenQ GW2490
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · IPSPhilips BDM3490UC/27
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSBenQ GW2490 and Philips BDM3490UC/27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: Philips BDM3490UC/27 leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ GW2490 leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
BenQ GW2490
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips BDM3490UC/27
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ GW2490 | Philips BDM3490UC/27 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 34.1″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $115 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ GW2490 or Philips BDM3490UC/27 better?
BenQ GW2490 and Philips BDM3490UC/27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: Philips BDM3490UC/27 leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ GW2490 leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ GW2490 leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).