BenQ GW2765HT vs LG 32QK500-W
BenQ GW2765HT
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSLG 32QK500-W
32″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ GW2765HT and LG 32QK500-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 53 and 53.
- Refresh rate: LG 32QK500-W leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ GW2765HT leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
BenQ GW2765HT
If you care most about response time.
LG 32QK500-W
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ GW2765HT | LG 32QK500-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 53 | Gear score | 53 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ GW2765HT or LG 32QK500-W better?
BenQ GW2765HT and LG 32QK500-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 53 and 53. Refresh rate: LG 32QK500-W leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ GW2765HT leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 32QK500-W leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).