BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 vs Samsung C32JG50
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · IPSSamsung C32JG50
32″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · VABenQ MOBIUZ EX240 and Samsung C32JG50 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 68.
- Resolution: Samsung C32JG50 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung C32JG50
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 | Samsung C32JG50 | |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Gear score | 68 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $228 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 or Samsung C32JG50 better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 and Samsung C32JG50 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 68. Resolution: Samsung C32JG50 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX240 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).