BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U vs Gigabyte AORUS FO48U
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSGigabyte AORUS FO48U
47.5″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · OLED · 2021BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U and Gigabyte AORUS FO48U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78.
- Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Gigabyte AORUS FO48U leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
If you care most about refresh rate.
Gigabyte AORUS FO48U
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U | Gigabyte AORUS FO48U | |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | Gear score | 78 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 47.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Release year | 2021 |
| ≈ $600 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U or Gigabyte AORUS FO48U better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U and Gigabyte AORUS FO48U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78. Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Gigabyte AORUS FO48U leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).