BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U vs Philips 25M2N5200P
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSPhilips 25M2N5200P
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 280 Hz · IPSBenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U and Philips 25M2N5200P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78.
- Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200P leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 25M2N5200P leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 25M2N5200P
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U | Philips 25M2N5200P | |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | Gear score | 78 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 280 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $600 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U or Philips 25M2N5200P better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U and Philips 25M2N5200P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78. Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200P leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Philips 25M2N5200P leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 25M2N5200P leads (280 Hz vs 144 Hz).