BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U vs Pixio PX278 Wave
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
32″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSPixio PX278 Wave
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSBenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U and Pixio PX278 Wave are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78.
- Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Pixio PX278 Wave leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Pixio PX278 Wave leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U
If you care most about resolution.
Pixio PX278 Wave
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U | Pixio PX278 Wave | |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | Gear score | 78 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $600 | Estimated price | ≈ $240 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U or Pixio PX278 Wave better?
BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U and Pixio PX278 Wave are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 78. Resolution: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Pixio PX278 Wave leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Pixio PX278 Wave leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Pixio PX278 Wave leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: BenQ MOBIUZ EX3210U ≈ $600, Pixio PX278 Wave ≈ $240. Current prices vary by store.