BenQ PD3200U vs LG 34BK95C-W
BenQ PD3200U
32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSLG 34BK95C-W
34″ · 3440×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ PD3200U and LG 34BK95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: BenQ PD3200U leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: LG 34BK95C-W leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ PD3200U leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
BenQ PD3200U
If you care most about resolution, response time.
LG 34BK95C-W
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ PD3200U | LG 34BK95C-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ PD3200U or LG 34BK95C-W better?
BenQ PD3200U and LG 34BK95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: BenQ PD3200U leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: LG 34BK95C-W leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ PD3200U leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 34BK95C-W leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).