Monitors / Comparison
BenQ PD3200U vs Philips 288E2E
Monitor · BenQ
BenQ PD3200U
32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Philips
Philips 288E2E
28″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time60
Verdict
BenQ PD3200U and Philips 288E2E are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ PD3200U | Philips 288E2E | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 28″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ PD3200U or Philips 288E2E better?
BenQ PD3200U and Philips 288E2E are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
Similar comparisons
BenQ PD3200U vs BenQ BL2711UBenQ PD3200U vs BenQ BL3201PHBenQ PD3200U vs ASUS MG24UQBenQ PD3200U vs ASUS PG27AQBenQ PD3200U vs ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-KPhilips 288E2E vs ASUS MG24UQPhilips 288E2E vs ASUS PG27AQPhilips 288E2E vs ASUS ProArt Display PA27UCX-KPhilips 288E2E vs BenQ BL2711UPhilips 288E2E vs BenQ BL3201PH