BenQ PD3200U vs Pixio PX347c Prime
BenQ PD3200U
32″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSPixio PX347c Prime
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VABenQ PD3200U and Pixio PX347c Prime are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: BenQ PD3200U leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Pixio PX347c Prime leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ PD3200U leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
BenQ PD3200U
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Pixio PX347c Prime
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ PD3200U | Pixio PX347c Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ PD3200U or Pixio PX347c Prime better?
BenQ PD3200U and Pixio PX347c Prime are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: BenQ PD3200U leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Pixio PX347c Prime leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ PD3200U leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Pixio PX347c Prime leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).