BenQ PD3420Q vs LG W2363D-PU
BenQ PD3420Q
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSLG W2363D-PU
23″ · 1920×1080 · 120 Hz · TNBenQ PD3420Q and LG W2363D-PU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: BenQ PD3420Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG W2363D-PU leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
BenQ PD3420Q
If you care most about resolution.
LG W2363D-PU
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ PD3420Q | LG W2363D-PU | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 23″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
| ≈ $800 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ PD3420Q or LG W2363D-PU better?
BenQ PD3420Q and LG W2363D-PU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: BenQ PD3420Q leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG W2363D-PU leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).