BenQ SW240 vs Philips 328E9QJAB
BenQ SW240
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPSPhilips 328E9QJAB
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VABenQ SW240 and Philips 328E9QJAB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46.
- Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 328E9QJAB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 328E9QJAB leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
BenQ SW240
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 328E9QJAB
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ SW240 | Philips 328E9QJAB | |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | Gear score | 46 |
| 24.1″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $466 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ SW240 or Philips 328E9QJAB better?
BenQ SW240 and Philips 328E9QJAB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46. Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 328E9QJAB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Philips 328E9QJAB leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 328E9QJAB leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).