Monitors / Comparison

BenQ SW240 vs QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte

Monitor · BenQ

BenQ SW240

24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 45.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution57
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · QNIX

QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte

27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · PLS
GEAR SCORE 46.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel65
Response time30
Verdict

BenQ SW240 and QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46.

  • Resolution: QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200).
  • Response time: BenQ SW240 leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this

BenQ SW240

If you care most about response time.

Pick this

QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ SW240QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte
45Gear score46
24.1″Screen size27″
1920×1200Resolution2560×1440
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelPLS
5 msResponse time8 ms
≈ $466Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is BenQ SW240 or QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte better?

BenQ SW240 and QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46. Resolution: QNIX QX2710 Evolution II Matte leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1200). Response time: BenQ SW240 leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).