BenQ SW240 vs Samsung S39C
BenQ SW240
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung S39C
27″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VABenQ SW240 and Samsung S39C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46.
- Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Samsung S39C leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung S39C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
BenQ SW240
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung S39C
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ SW240 | Samsung S39C | |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | Gear score | 46 |
| 24.1″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $466 | Estimated price | ≈ $140 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ SW240 or Samsung S39C better?
BenQ SW240 and Samsung S39C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46. Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Samsung S39C leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung S39C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung S39C leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: BenQ SW240 ≈ $466, Samsung S39C ≈ $140. Current prices vary by store.