BenQ SW240 vs X= XG27IPS
BenQ SW240
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPSX= XG27IPS
27″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSBenQ SW240 and X= XG27IPS are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46.
- Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: X= XG27IPS leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ SW240 leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
BenQ SW240
If you care most about resolution, response time.
X= XG27IPS
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ SW240 | X= XG27IPS | |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | Gear score | 46 |
| 24.1″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| ≈ $466 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ SW240 or X= XG27IPS better?
BenQ SW240 and X= XG27IPS are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46. Resolution: BenQ SW240 leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: X= XG27IPS leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: BenQ SW240 leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: X= XG27IPS leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).