BenQ XL2411T vs Samsung S23A950D
BenQ XL2411T
24″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNSamsung S23A950D
23″ · 1920×1080 · 120 HzBenQ XL2411T and Samsung S23A950D are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56.
- Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung S23A950D leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
BenQ XL2411T
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung S23A950D
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ XL2411T | Samsung S23A950D | |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Gear score | 56 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 23″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ XL2411T or Samsung S23A950D better?
BenQ XL2411T and Samsung S23A950D are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 56 and 56. Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Samsung S23A950D leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ XL2411T leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).