BenQ XL2735 vs Gigabyte AORUS KD25F
BenQ XL2735
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNGigabyte AORUS KD25F
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNBenQ XL2735 and Gigabyte AORUS KD25F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: BenQ XL2735 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS KD25F leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
BenQ XL2735
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte AORUS KD25F
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ XL2735 | Gigabyte AORUS KD25F | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| TN | Panel | TN |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ XL2735 or Gigabyte AORUS KD25F better?
BenQ XL2735 and Gigabyte AORUS KD25F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: BenQ XL2735 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS KD25F leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS KD25F leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).