BenQ XL2735 vs LG 34UC89G-B
BenQ XL2735
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNLG 34UC89G-B
34″ · 2560×1080 · 166 Hz · IPSBenQ XL2735 and LG 34UC89G-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: BenQ XL2735 leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 34UC89G-B leads (166 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: BenQ XL2735 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
BenQ XL2735
If you care most about resolution, response time.
LG 34UC89G-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ XL2735 | LG 34UC89G-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 166 Hz |
| TN | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ XL2735 or LG 34UC89G-B better?
BenQ XL2735 and LG 34UC89G-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: BenQ XL2735 leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: LG 34UC89G-B leads (166 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: BenQ XL2735 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 34UC89G-B leads (166 Hz vs 144 Hz).