BenQ XR3501 vs Sceptre C248B-FWT168
BenQ XR3501
35″ · 2560×1080 · 144 Hz · VASceptre C248B-FWT168
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VABenQ XR3501 and Sceptre C248B-FWT168 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63.
- Resolution: BenQ XR3501 leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Sceptre C248B-FWT168 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
BenQ XR3501
If you care most about resolution.
Sceptre C248B-FWT168
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ XR3501 | Sceptre C248B-FWT168 | |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Gear score | 63 |
| 35″ | Screen size | 23.6″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $110 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ XR3501 or Sceptre C248B-FWT168 better?
BenQ XR3501 and Sceptre C248B-FWT168 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 63 and 63. Resolution: BenQ XR3501 leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Sceptre C248B-FWT168 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Sceptre C248B-FWT168 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).