Cooler Master GM27-CF vs Samsung LC43J890DKNXZA
Cooler Master GM27-CF
27″ · 1920×1080 · 165 HzSamsung LC43J890DKNXZA
43″ · 3840×1200 · 120 Hz · VACooler Master GM27-CF and Samsung LC43J890DKNXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64.
- Resolution: Samsung LC43J890DKNXZA leads (3840×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
Cooler Master GM27-CF
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Samsung LC43J890DKNXZA
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Cooler Master GM27-CF | Samsung LC43J890DKNXZA | |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Gear score | 64 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 43″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×1200 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| — | Panel | VA |
| 3 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Cooler Master GM27-CF or Samsung LC43J890DKNXZA better?
Cooler Master GM27-CF and Samsung LC43J890DKNXZA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 64 and 64. Resolution: Samsung LC43J890DKNXZA leads (3840×1200 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM27-CF leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).