Cooler Master GM2711S vs Gigabyte M32UC
Cooler Master GM2711S
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSGigabyte M32UC
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · VACooler Master GM2711S and Gigabyte M32UC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77.
- Resolution: Gigabyte M32UC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM2711S leads (180 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Cooler Master GM2711S
If you care most about refresh rate.
Gigabyte M32UC
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Cooler Master GM2711S | Gigabyte M32UC | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 77 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $580 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Cooler Master GM2711S or Gigabyte M32UC better?
Cooler Master GM2711S and Gigabyte M32UC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77. Resolution: Gigabyte M32UC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM2711S leads (180 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM2711S leads (180 Hz vs 160 Hz).