Cooler Master GM2711S vs LG 38BN95C-W
Cooler Master GM2711S
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · IPSLG 38BN95C-W
38″ · 3840×1600 · 144 Hz · Nano IPSCooler Master GM2711S and LG 38BN95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77.
- Resolution: LG 38BN95C-W leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM2711S leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: LG 38BN95C-W leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Cooler Master GM2711S
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 38BN95C-W
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Cooler Master GM2711S | LG 38BN95C-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 77 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 38″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1600 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Nano IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,830 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Cooler Master GM2711S or LG 38BN95C-W better?
Cooler Master GM2711S and LG 38BN95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 77. Resolution: LG 38BN95C-W leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM2711S leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: LG 38BN95C-W leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Cooler Master GM2711S leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).