Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q vs MSI MAG 255F E20
Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 255F E20
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Rapid IPSCooler Master Tempest GP27Q and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Resolution: Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255F E20
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q | MSI MAG 255F E20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Rapid IPS |
| — | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $435 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q or MSI MAG 255F E20 better?
Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Resolution: Cooler Master Tempest GP27Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).