Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 vs LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · OLEDLG UltraGear 27GX700A-B
26.5″ · 2560×1440 · 280 Hz · OLEDCorsair XENEON 27QHD240 and LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 89.
- Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B leads (280 Hz vs 240 Hz).
LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 | LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 89 | Gear score | 89 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 26.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 280 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | OLED |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $1,080 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 or LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B better?
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 and LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 89. Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B leads (280 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27GX700A-B leads (280 Hz vs 240 Hz).