Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 vs LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · OLEDLG UltraGear 45GX950A-B
44.5″ · 5120×2160 · 165 Hz · OLEDCorsair XENEON 27QHD240 and LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 88.
- Resolution: LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B leads (5120×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 | LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 89 | Gear score | 88 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 44.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | OLED |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| ≈ $1,080 | Estimated price | ≈ $2,000 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 or LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B better?
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 and LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 88. Resolution: LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B leads (5120×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 ≈ $1,080, LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B ≈ $2,000. Current prices vary by store.